JEFFERSON v. BARLESS, 3:12-00485. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20140512960
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2014
Summary: ORDER KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge. Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 193), recommending that the Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 122 & 144) filed by Defendants George Barlis and Corizon Inc. (which is improperly named in the Complaint as Corizon Mental Health) be granted because Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as to those Defendants. Despite being specifically informed that any objection to the Report and Recommendation nee
Summary: ORDER KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge. Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 193), recommending that the Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 122 & 144) filed by Defendants George Barlis and Corizon Inc. (which is improperly named in the Complaint as Corizon Mental Health) be granted because Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as to those Defendants. Despite being specifically informed that any objection to the Report and Recommendation need..
More
ORDER
KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 193), recommending that the Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 122 & 144) filed by Defendants George Barlis and Corizon Inc. (which is improperly named in the Complaint as Corizon Mental Health) be granted because Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as to those Defendants. Despite being specifically informed that any objection to the Report and Recommendation needed to be filed within fourteen days of receipt, Plaintiff has filed no objections. Having undertaken the de novo review required by Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED. The Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Barlis (Docket No. 122) and Corizon (Docket No. 144) are hereby GRANTED, and the claims against those Defendants are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
It is SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
