Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE AREDIA® AND ZOMETA® PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 3:06-MD-1760. (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20140602d88 Visitors: 23
Filed: May 30, 2014
Latest Update: May 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER JOE B. BROWN, Magistrate Judge. Failure to respond to Interrogatory 1 or 4, depending on when the interrogatories were served, has been a recurring problem. The purpose of this order is to again clarify the court's stated position on this issue. Specifically, if plaintiffs "fail to timely produce the ordered discovery, their medical damages evidence will be precluded." (DE 6799 at p. 3) In those cases attached as Exhibit 1 where Novartis has requested medical expenses, plaintiffs shall
More

ORDER

JOE B. BROWN, Magistrate Judge.

Failure to respond to Interrogatory 1 or 4, depending on when the interrogatories were served, has been a recurring problem. The purpose of this order is to again clarify the court's stated position on this issue. Specifically, if plaintiffs "fail to timely produce the ordered discovery, their medical damages evidence will be precluded." (DE 6799 at p. 3)

In those cases attached as Exhibit 1 where Novartis has requested medical expenses, plaintiffs shall comply with those requests as required under Rule 26, Fed. R. Civ. P. In those instances where plaintiffs have failed to respond to Novartis's request, those plaintiffs shall do so not later than June 20, 2014. Thereafter, plaintiffs shall supplement those medical expenses every ninety (90) days. Absent good cause shown, failure to provide medical expenses as instructed above will preclude plaintiffs from seeking damages for those medical expenses not submitted.

It is so ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer