SOIMIS v. LESTER, 2:14-0008. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20140619c61
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge. In accordance with the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, the Court finds merit in respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry No.12). Therefore, said Motion is GRANTED and this action is hereby DISMISSED. Rule 8(a), Rules — 2254 Cases. Should the petitioner file a timely Notice of Appeal, such Notice shall be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. 2253(c), which will NOT issue because the petitioner has been unab
Summary: ORDER KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge. In accordance with the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, the Court finds merit in respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry No.12). Therefore, said Motion is GRANTED and this action is hereby DISMISSED. Rule 8(a), Rules — 2254 Cases. Should the petitioner file a timely Notice of Appeal, such Notice shall be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. 2253(c), which will NOT issue because the petitioner has been unabl..
More
ORDER
KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge.
In accordance with the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, the Court finds merit in respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry No.12). Therefore, said Motion is GRANTED and this action is hereby DISMISSED. Rule 8(a), Rules — § 2254 Cases.
Should the petitioner file a timely Notice of Appeal, such Notice shall be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), which will NOT issue because the petitioner has been unable to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
