O CORP CORPORATION v. ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. COMPANY, 3:14-1061. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20140821d24
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2014
Summary: ORDER ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge. It is hereby ORDERED that the Appellants' Motion For Leave to File Reply to Appellees' Sur-Reply is GRANTED, but its request for oral argument, contained within the same filing (Docket No. 20), is DENIED. It is so ORDERED.
ORDER
ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.
It is hereby ORDERED that the Appellants' Motion For Leave to File Reply to Appellees' Sur-Reply is GRANTED, but its request for oral argument, contained within the same filing (Docket No. 20), is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
