U.S. v. WHITSON, 3:12-00013. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20140918c57
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the Defendant's Motion To Amend Order (Docket No. 782). Through the Motion, the Defendant points out that the Court's Order (Docket No. 774) denying her Motion For New Trial mistakenly stated that she was convicted of Counts Five and Seven. The Defendant was actually acquitted of Count Seven, and convicted of Count Five. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion To Amend Order (Docket No. 782) is GRANTED, and the Court's Order (Docket
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the Defendant's Motion To Amend Order (Docket No. 782). Through the Motion, the Defendant points out that the Court's Order (Docket No. 774) denying her Motion For New Trial mistakenly stated that she was convicted of Counts Five and Seven. The Defendant was actually acquitted of Count Seven, and convicted of Count Five. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion To Amend Order (Docket No. 782) is GRANTED, and the Court's Order (Docket N..
More
ORDER
TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Defendant's Motion To Amend Order (Docket No. 782). Through the Motion, the Defendant points out that the Court's Order (Docket No. 774) denying her Motion For New Trial mistakenly stated that she was convicted of Counts Five and Seven.
The Defendant was actually acquitted of Count Seven, and convicted of Count Five. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion To Amend Order (Docket No. 782) is GRANTED, and the Court's Order (Docket No. 774) is VACATED.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
