MAY v. APRICUS BIOSCIENCES, INC., Case 3:13-cv-00554. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20141006a38
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Docket Entry No. 24) is hereby GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (Docket Entry No. 33) is hereby DENIED. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare a separate judgment in accordance with Rule 58(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is SO OR
Summary: ORDER KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Docket Entry No. 24) is hereby GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (Docket Entry No. 33) is hereby DENIED. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare a separate judgment in accordance with Rule 58(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is SO ORD..
More
ORDER
KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge.
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Docket Entry No. 24) is hereby GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (Docket Entry No. 33) is hereby DENIED.
The Clerk of the Court shall prepare a separate judgment in accordance with Rule 58(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
It is SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
