WILLIAMS v. U.S., 3:10-1176. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20141006a42
Visitors: 18
Filed: Sep. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court are certain claims raised by Petitioner in a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct Sentence By A Person In Federal Custody (Docket No. 1), along with supplemental materials filed by the Petitioner in support of the Motion, and the Government's filings in opposition. Based on the record of Petitioner's underlying conviction, and the entire record in this case, and for the reasons set forth in the accompa
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court are certain claims raised by Petitioner in a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct Sentence By A Person In Federal Custody (Docket No. 1), along with supplemental materials filed by the Petitioner in support of the Motion, and the Government's filings in opposition. Based on the record of Petitioner's underlying conviction, and the entire record in this case, and for the reasons set forth in the accompan..
More
ORDER
TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are certain claims raised by Petitioner in a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct Sentence By A Person In Federal Custody (Docket No. 1), along with supplemental materials filed by the Petitioner in support of the Motion, and the Government's filings in opposition.
Based on the record of Petitioner's underlying conviction, and the entire record in this case, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court concludes that Petitioner's Motion To Vacate is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED.
This Order shall constitute the judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
Should the Petitioner give timely notice of an appeal from this Memorandum and Order, such notice shall be treated as a application for a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. 2253(c), which will not issue because the Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Castro v. United States, 310 F.3d 900 (6th Cir. 2002).
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
