SPECIALTY MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. v. HALL, 3:14-cv-1152. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20150804e46
Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER ALETA A. TRAUGER , District Judge . The defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 58) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum. This action will proceed to trial on (1) the plaintiff's breach of contract claim concerning defendants Hall and Whitford's non-disclosure and confidentiality restrictive covenants, and (2) the plaintiff's claim that Hall and Whitford breached their fiduciary duty by soliciting Fisher & Paykel. All other
Summary: ORDER ALETA A. TRAUGER , District Judge . The defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 58) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum. This action will proceed to trial on (1) the plaintiff's breach of contract claim concerning defendants Hall and Whitford's non-disclosure and confidentiality restrictive covenants, and (2) the plaintiff's claim that Hall and Whitford breached their fiduciary duty by soliciting Fisher & Paykel. All other c..
More
ORDER
ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.
The defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 58) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum. This action will proceed to trial on (1) the plaintiff's breach of contract claim concerning defendants Hall and Whitford's non-disclosure and confidentiality restrictive covenants, and (2) the plaintiff's claim that Hall and Whitford breached their fiduciary duty by soliciting Fisher & Paykel. All other claims are dismissed.
The defendants' Motion to Exclude All Proof of Damages Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 (Docket No. 61) is DENIED. However, the defendants may re-depose Hilary Sherman for one day within the next thirty days.
The defendants' Motion to Exclude Undisclosed Documents and Strike Paragraphs Four Through Eight of the Declaration of Anthony Lair (Docket No. 69) is DENIED AS MOOT.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
