HOLLIS v. HOWARD, 3-14-2343. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20160121b86
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL , District Judge . Pending before the Court are Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 33) and Defendants' Request for Leave to File Reply (Docket No. 42). Defendants' Request for Leave to File Reply is GRANTED, and the Clerk is directed to file the Reply attached to the Request (Docket No. 42-1). The referral of dispositive motions to the Magistrate Judge is revoked. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No.
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL , District Judge . Pending before the Court are Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 33) and Defendants' Request for Leave to File Reply (Docket No. 42). Defendants' Request for Leave to File Reply is GRANTED, and the Clerk is directed to file the Reply attached to the Request (Docket No. 42-1). The referral of dispositive motions to the Magistrate Judge is revoked. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 3..
More
ORDER
TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 33) and Defendants' Request for Leave to File Reply (Docket No. 42). Defendants' Request for Leave to File Reply is GRANTED, and the Clerk is directed to file the Reply attached to the Request (Docket No. 42-1).
The referral of dispositive motions to the Magistrate Judge is revoked. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 33) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle