AKRIDGE v. FINNEGAN, 3:13-cv-00588. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20160224e41
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2016
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM J. HAYNES, Jr. , Senior District Judge . In accordance with the Memorandum filed herewith, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. (Docket Entry No. 86). Due to material factual disputes, the Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 53) is DENIED on Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim for a prolonged seizure and the Plaintiff's partial motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 56) is also DENIED . Based upon Plaintiff's stipulation and lack of
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM J. HAYNES, Jr. , Senior District Judge . In accordance with the Memorandum filed herewith, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. (Docket Entry No. 86). Due to material factual disputes, the Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 53) is DENIED on Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim for a prolonged seizure and the Plaintiff's partial motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 56) is also DENIED . Based upon Plaintiff's stipulation and lack of o..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM J. HAYNES, Jr., Senior District Judge.
In accordance with the Memorandum filed herewith, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. (Docket Entry No. 86). Due to material factual disputes, the Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 53) is DENIED on Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim for a prolonged seizure and the Plaintiff's partial motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 56) is also DENIED. Based upon Plaintiff's stipulation and lack of objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim for unreasonable search and his First Amendment retaliation claim are DISMISSED with prejudice.
The parties shall submit an Agreed Order for trial date.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
