Spillers v. Colvin, 2:14-cv-0106. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20160307a08
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER KEVIN H. SHARP , District Judge . Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 22) as to Plaintiff Robin Lynn Spiller's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Docket No. 19). Plaintiff had sought judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner's denial of Plaintiff's application for a period of disability and disability insurance under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 423(a). In the R & R, the Magistrate Ju
Summary: ORDER KEVIN H. SHARP , District Judge . Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 22) as to Plaintiff Robin Lynn Spiller's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Docket No. 19). Plaintiff had sought judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner's denial of Plaintiff's application for a period of disability and disability insurance under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 423(a). In the R & R, the Magistrate Jud..
More
ORDER
KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 22) as to Plaintiff Robin Lynn Spiller's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Docket No. 19). Plaintiff had sought judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner's denial of Plaintiff's application for a period of disability and disability insurance under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423(a). In the R & R, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff's Motion be denied and that the Social Security Commissioner's decision be affirmed. Plaintiff made no objections.
Where no objections are made to the R & R, "[t]he district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions." FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). Having conducted a de novo review in accordance with Rule 72, the Court will accept the disposition set forth in the R & R. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows:
(1) The R & R (Docket No. 22) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED;
(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 19) is hereby DENIED; and
(3) The Social Security Commissioner's decision is hereby AFFIRMED.
The Clerk of the Court shall enter Final Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
It is SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
