Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

J.H. v. WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 3-14-2356. (2017)

Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20170324j14 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2017
Summary: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE REPLY TO WILLIAMSON COUNTY'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REVIEW THE DENIAL OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND ALETA A. TRAUGER , District Judge . Now comes the Plaintiff, J.H., by next friend Betty Harris, and through Counsel, and files this Motion for Leave of Court to file a Reply to Williamson County's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Review the Denial of the Plaintiff's Motion to Amend. The pleadings before t
More

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE REPLY TO WILLIAMSON COUNTY'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REVIEW THE DENIAL OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND

Now comes the Plaintiff, J.H., by next friend Betty Harris, and through Counsel, and files this Motion for Leave of Court to file a Reply to Williamson County's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Review the Denial of the Plaintiff's Motion to Amend.

The pleadings before the Court are as follows:

Doc. 109 — Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint and for Relief from the Scheduling Order

Doc. 122 — Defendant Williamson County's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend

Doc. 143 — Order denying Plaintiff's Motion to Amend by Magistrate Judge finding lack of diligent efforts in requesting relief from the scheduling order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer