Phillips v. United States Department of Education, 3:17-cv-01026. (2017)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20171208g45
Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2017
Summary: ORDER ALETA A. TRAUGER , District Judge . On November 9, 2017, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #19), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant ConServe (Docket No. 7) and the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant University of Phoenix (Dock
Summary: ORDER ALETA A. TRAUGER , District Judge . On November 9, 2017, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #19), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant ConServe (Docket No. 7) and the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant University of Phoenix (Docke..
More
ORDER
ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.
On November 9, 2017, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #19), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant ConServe (Docket No. 7) and the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant University of Phoenix (Docket No. 8) are granted, and all claims against these two defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. Any appeal from this ruling will not be certified as taken in good faith.
This case is returned to the magistrate judge for further handling under the original referral order.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
