Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Crockett v. Stults, 1:17-cv-00001. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20180221m51 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge, recommending the Court grant Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 23.) Plaintiff did not file timely objections. After a de novo review of the record, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 21) is GRANTED. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Cle
More

ORDER

Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge, recommending the Court grant Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 23.) Plaintiff did not file timely objections. After a de novo review of the record, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.

Accordingly, Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 21) is GRANTED. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.

The Court CERTIFIES that an appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer