Hadi v. Commissioner of Social Security, 3:16-cv-03014. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20180416a58
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. , Chief District Judge . Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) in which the Magistrate Judge recommends granting the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 21) and remanding this matter to the Commissioner for re-evaluation of the opinion evidence and the residual functional capacity. No timely objection has been filed by the Commissioner despite specific instructions that were provided in the Re
Summary: ORDER WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. , Chief District Judge . Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) in which the Magistrate Judge recommends granting the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 21) and remanding this matter to the Commissioner for re-evaluation of the opinion evidence and the residual functional capacity. No timely objection has been filed by the Commissioner despite specific instructions that were provided in the Rep..
More
ORDER
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., Chief District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) in which the Magistrate Judge recommends granting the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 21) and remanding this matter to the Commissioner for re-evaluation of the opinion evidence and the residual functional capacity. No timely objection has been filed by the Commissioner despite specific instructions that were provided in the Report and Recommendation.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and agrees with the Magistrate Judge's analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 30) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. The Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 21) is GRANTED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for re-evaluation of the opinion evidence and the residual functional capacity as explained in the Report and Recommendation.
This is a final order under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk shall close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle