Idemia Identity & Security USA, LLC v. Migneco, 3:18-cv-00239. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20180920f88
Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. , District Judge . Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 38), which was filed on July 2, 2018. Through the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends Defendant Joseph Migneco be dismissed without prejudice for failure to obtain service of process under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Although the Report advised the parties that any objections must be filed within 14 days of se
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. , District Judge . Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 38), which was filed on July 2, 2018. Through the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends Defendant Joseph Migneco be dismissed without prejudice for failure to obtain service of process under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Although the Report advised the parties that any objections must be filed within 14 days of ser..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR., District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 38), which was filed on July 2, 2018. Through the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends Defendant Joseph Migneco be dismissed without prejudice for failure to obtain service of process under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Although the Report advised the parties that any objections must be filed within 14 days of service, no objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendant Joseph Migneco is DISMISSED from this action.
Also pending before the Court is a Joint Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. No. 43), filed by Plaintiff and Defendant Biometrics4All, Inc., requesting this case be dismissed with prejudice as to that Defendant. Accordingly, Defendant Biometrics4All, Inc. is DISMISSED, with prejudice. All pending motions are denied, as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file.
This Order shall constitute the final judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
