Whiteside v. Hickman County, 1:17-cv-00024. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20181024f96
Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. , District Judge . This case has been reassigned to the undersigned Judge. Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 25), which was filed on September 26, 2018. (Doc. No. 37). In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted and the action be dismissed with prejudice. Although the Report and Recommendati
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. , District Judge . This case has been reassigned to the undersigned Judge. Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 25), which was filed on September 26, 2018. (Doc. No. 37). In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted and the action be dismissed with prejudice. Although the Report and Recommendatio..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR., District Judge.
This case has been reassigned to the undersigned Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 25), which was filed on September 26, 2018. (Doc. No. 37). In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted and the action be dismissed with prejudice.
Although the Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections must be filed within fourteen days of service, no objections were filed.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes that it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
