Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Parker v. Comprehensive Logistics Co., 1:19-cv-00013. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20190409e86 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. , District Judge . Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14), which was filed on March 18, 2019. Through the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Defendant's Notice of Removal (Doc. No. 6) and Amended Motion to Quash (Doc. No. 9) be denied, and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4) be granted and this action be dismissed with prejudice. Although the Report
More

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14), which was filed on March 18, 2019. Through the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Defendant's Notice of Removal (Doc. No. 6) and Amended Motion to Quash (Doc. No. 9) be denied, and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4) be granted and this action be dismissed with prejudice. Although the Report advised the parties that any objections must be filed within 14 days of service, no objections have been filed.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Defendant's Notice of Removal (Doc. No. 6) and Amended Motion to Quash (Doc. No. 9) are DENIED, and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4) is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.

It is so ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer