Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hamilton v. Ally Financial, 3:19-cv-00451. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20190924e46 Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 10) recommending that Ally Financial's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 7), to which Hamilton has not responded, be granted and this matter dismissed. No objections have been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Upon de novo review in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended d
More

ORDER

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 10) recommending that Ally Financial's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 7), to which Hamilton has not responded, be granted and this matter dismissed. No objections have been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

Upon de novo review in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED, and Ally Financial's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 7) is GRANTED. This shall serve as the final order in this matter and the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer