Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bustillo v. McAleenan, 3:19-cv-00388. (2020)

Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20200318f37 Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 17, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2020
Summary: ORDER ELI RICHARDSON , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 18). The Court DENIES Defendants' Motion to Dismiss brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Accordingly, the Court acknowledges that all claims in this action have been DISMISSED with prejudice, and
More

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 18). The Court DENIES Defendants' Motion to Dismiss brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Accordingly, the Court acknowledges that all claims in this action have been DISMISSED with prejudice, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute final judgment for purposes of Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer