Cameron v. Southwest Tennessee Community College, 17-cv-02455-SHL-tmp. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20180718d78
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SHERYL H. LIPMAN , District Judge . Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham's Report and Recommendation ("Report") (ECF No. 34), filed June 27, 2018, recommending that Defendant Southwest Tennessee Community College's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. A magistrate judge may submit to a judge of the court proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of a motion for summary judgment. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). "Withi
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SHERYL H. LIPMAN , District Judge . Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham's Report and Recommendation ("Report") (ECF No. 34), filed June 27, 2018, recommending that Defendant Southwest Tennessee Community College's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. A magistrate judge may submit to a judge of the court proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of a motion for summary judgment. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). "Within..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
SHERYL H. LIPMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham's Report and Recommendation ("Report") (ECF No. 34), filed June 27, 2018, recommending that Defendant Southwest Tennessee Community College's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted.
A magistrate judge may submit to a judge of the court proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of a motion for summary judgment. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). "Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A district court reviews de novo only those proposed findings of fact or conclusions of law to which a party specifically objects. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
The deadline to object to the Report was July 11, 2018, and Plaintiff filed no objections.1 The Court has reviewed the Report for clear error and finds none. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report. Southwest's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claim against Defendant is DISMISSED. Judgment will be entered for Southwest.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Ms. Cameron also failed to respond to Southwest's requests for admission, Southwest's Motion for Summary Judgment, and an order to show cause why Southwest's Motion should not be granted. (ECF No. 34 at 3.)
Source: Leagle
