U.S. v. Smith, 1:16-CR-10089-STA. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20180822f15
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND SUBSTITUTING NEW COUNSEL S. THOMAS ANDERSON , Chief District Judge . This matter came to be heard upon the Motion of counsel for Defendant, Mr. Charles Smith, requesting to withdraw as counsel. The Court finds that this motion is well taken, as an actual conflict of interest exists, and should be granted. The Court also holds in abeyance all pre-trial deadlines and dates pursuant to the scheduling order. The Court will appoint new counsel as expeditious
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND SUBSTITUTING NEW COUNSEL S. THOMAS ANDERSON , Chief District Judge . This matter came to be heard upon the Motion of counsel for Defendant, Mr. Charles Smith, requesting to withdraw as counsel. The Court finds that this motion is well taken, as an actual conflict of interest exists, and should be granted. The Court also holds in abeyance all pre-trial deadlines and dates pursuant to the scheduling order. The Court will appoint new counsel as expeditiousl..
More
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND SUBSTITUTING NEW COUNSEL
S. THOMAS ANDERSON, Chief District Judge.
This matter came to be heard upon the Motion of counsel for Defendant, Mr. Charles Smith, requesting to withdraw as counsel. The Court finds that this motion is well taken, as an actual conflict of interest exists, and should be granted. The Court also holds in abeyance all pre-trial deadlines and dates pursuant to the scheduling order. The Court will appoint new counsel as expeditiously as possible.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
