United States v. Johnson, 18-CR-20027-JTF (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20191008r92
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2019
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS CHARMIANE G. CLAXTON , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Defendant Shuntario Johnson's Motion to Suppress the pretrial identification made by Ricky Stevenson. (D.E. #216). Defendant's Motion was filed on July 18, 2019. A response to the Motion was filed by the United States on July 25, 2019. (D.E. # 218) and the motion was referred by District Judge John T. Fowlkes for report and recommendation on August 20, 2019 (D.E. #238).
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS CHARMIANE G. CLAXTON , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Defendant Shuntario Johnson's Motion to Suppress the pretrial identification made by Ricky Stevenson. (D.E. #216). Defendant's Motion was filed on July 18, 2019. A response to the Motion was filed by the United States on July 25, 2019. (D.E. # 218) and the motion was referred by District Judge John T. Fowlkes for report and recommendation on August 20, 2019 (D.E. #238). A..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS
CHARMIANE G. CLAXTON, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Shuntario Johnson's Motion to Suppress the pretrial identification made by Ricky Stevenson. (D.E. #216). Defendant's Motion was filed on July 18, 2019. A response to the Motion was filed by the United States on July 25, 2019. (D.E. # 218) and the motion was referred by District Judge John T. Fowlkes for report and recommendation on August 20, 2019 (D.E. #238). A hearing on the Motion was held on August 30, 2019, at which time the Court heard the testimony of witnesses and statements of counsel.
Based upon the evidence presented and for the reasons stated in open court on August 30, 2019, it is recommended that defendant's Motion to Suppress evidence be DENIED. A transcript of the Court's oral ruling (D.E. # 253) will serve as written proposed findings of fact and recommended conclusions of law.
Source: Leagle
