NORMAN IP HOLDINGS, LLC v. LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., 6:11-cv-495-LED-JDL. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20130911c22
Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2013
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge. The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge ("R&R") has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 665). The Magistrate Judge recommends granting Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s ("AMD") Motion to Dismiss Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.'s ("Volksw
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge. The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge ("R&R") has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 665). The Magistrate Judge recommends granting Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s ("AMD") Motion to Dismiss Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.'s ("Volkswa..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge.
The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge ("R&R") has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 665). The Magistrate Judge recommends granting Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s ("AMD") Motion to Dismiss Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.'s ("Volkswagen") Third-Party Claim Against AMD (Doc. No. 569). Volkswagen was given 14 days from the date of the R&R to amend its complaint, and did so by filing a filing a First Amended Third-Party Complaint Against AMD (Doc. No. 676) on July 30, 2013. No objections have been filed. Having carefully considered the parties' arguments, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings of this Court.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that AMD's original Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED.
So ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
