SLADE v. CITY OF MARSHALL TEXAS, 2:13-CV-1102-RSP. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20140805b20
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 04, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER ROY S. PAYNE, District Judge. For the reasons orally assigned in Open Court on May 28, 2014: (1) all state law claims against the individual officers are dismissed without prejudice by agreement of Plaintiff, to be pursued only against the City of Marshall; (2) the battery claim is not asserted against Defendant TASER, by agreement of Plaintiff; and (3) Plaintiff is Ordered to file an amended complaint concerning the bystander claim on behalf of the decedent's nephew, attempt
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER ROY S. PAYNE, District Judge. For the reasons orally assigned in Open Court on May 28, 2014: (1) all state law claims against the individual officers are dismissed without prejudice by agreement of Plaintiff, to be pursued only against the City of Marshall; (2) the battery claim is not asserted against Defendant TASER, by agreement of Plaintiff; and (3) Plaintiff is Ordered to file an amended complaint concerning the bystander claim on behalf of the decedent's nephew, attempti..
More
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ROY S. PAYNE, District Judge.
For the reasons orally assigned in Open Court on May 28, 2014: (1) all state law claims against the individual officers are dismissed without prejudice by agreement of Plaintiff, to be pursued only against the City of Marshall; (2) the battery claim is not asserted against Defendant TASER, by agreement of Plaintiff; and (3) Plaintiff is Ordered to file an amended complaint concerning the bystander claim on behalf of the decedent's nephew, attempting to cure the issues raised by Defendant in the motion to dismiss, within 10 days, and Defendant may reurge its motion on that issue within 10 days thereafter if deemed appropriate.
Source: Leagle
