Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

C.P. v. KRUM INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, 4:13cv63. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Texas Number: infdco20140918c87 Visitors: 1
Filed: Sep. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RON CLARK, District Judge. Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On August 6, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Krum Independent School District's Motion for Judgm
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

RON CLARK, District Judge.

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 6, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Krum Independent School District's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #27] be granted, Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #32] be denied, and Krum Independent School District's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Response to the District's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #35] be denied.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the court.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Krum Independent School District's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #27] is GRANTED, Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #32] is DENIED, and Krum Independent School District's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Response to the District's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #35] is DENIED.

The court further ORDERS that this case is dismissed with prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer