GOFF v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 6:13cv302. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20140924j51
Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, District Judge. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this action, has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed and that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff filed written objections on September
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, District Judge. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this action, has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed and that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff filed written objections on September ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, District Judge.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this action, has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed and that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff filed written objections on September 8, 2014.
Having made a de novo review of the objections filed by Plaintiff, the Court finds that the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and Plaintiff's objections are without merit. There is substantial evidence in the record supporting the Commissioner's decision. The findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are, therefore, adopted as those of the Court. It is
ORDERED that Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and this Social Security action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further
ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED.
Source: Leagle