U.S. v. WATTS, 4:07cr42. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20141209b20
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. SCHELL, District Judge. Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, this Court having heretofore referred the request for the revocation of Defendant's supervised release to the United States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to its order, and the parties' waiver of right to file objections, this C
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. SCHELL, District Judge. Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, this Court having heretofore referred the request for the revocation of Defendant's supervised release to the United States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to its order, and the parties' waiver of right to file objections, this Co..
More
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
RICHARD A. SCHELL, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, this Court having heretofore referred the request for the revocation of Defendant's supervised release to the United States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to its order, and the parties' waiver of right to file objections, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts same as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is therefore,
ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. It is further
ORDERED that Defendant's supervised release is hereby REVOKED. It is further
ORDERED that Defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of ten (10) R months with no supervised release to follow. The Court recommends that Defendant be housed in the Bureau of Prisons, Seagoville Unit.
Source: Leagle
