HENDERSON v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., 1:14-cv-224. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20150303d28
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE THAD HEARTFIELD , District Judge . The court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial proceedings. (Doc. No. 24.) Pending before the court is the "Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. No. 17) filed by the Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. The court has received and considered the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 30), recommending that the
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE THAD HEARTFIELD , District Judge . The court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial proceedings. (Doc. No. 24.) Pending before the court is the "Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. No. 17) filed by the Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. The court has received and considered the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 30), recommending that the ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
THAD HEARTFIELD, District Judge.
The court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial proceedings. (Doc. No. 24.) Pending before the court is the "Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. No. 17) filed by the Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. The court has received and considered the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 30), recommending that the court grant in part Wal-Mart's motion. No objections were filed to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed.
It is therefore ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. No. 30) is ADOPTED; and Wal-Mart's "Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. No. 17) is GRANTED IN PART.
Source: Leagle
