JOSEPH v. SIGNAL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C., 1:13-CV-324. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20150306b47
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RON CLARK , District Judge . The court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial proceedings. (Doc. No. 4.) Pending before the court is the "Motion of Amended Plaintiffs to Dismiss Without Prejudice the Claims Against Defendant Michael Pol." (Doc. No. 98.) The following Plaintiffs moved to dismiss their claims against Michael Pol: Suresh Kakkoth, Sebastian George
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RON CLARK , District Judge . The court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial proceedings. (Doc. No. 4.) Pending before the court is the "Motion of Amended Plaintiffs to Dismiss Without Prejudice the Claims Against Defendant Michael Pol." (Doc. No. 98.) The following Plaintiffs moved to dismiss their claims against Michael Pol: Suresh Kakkoth, Sebastian George P..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
RON CLARK, District Judge.
The court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial proceedings. (Doc. No. 4.) Pending before the court is the "Motion of Amended Plaintiffs to Dismiss Without Prejudice the Claims Against Defendant Michael Pol." (Doc. No. 98.) The following Plaintiffs moved to dismiss their claims against Michael Pol: Suresh Kakkoth, Sebastian George Pananjikal, Biju Potrayil, Pankajakshan Madhavan, Gijo John, Joy Kallachiyil Varkey, Omanakuttan Govindan Kakkanthara, Iju James, Ravi Rowthu, Vasavan Babu, Abraham Varghese, Varghese Kannampuzha Devassy, Paulose Chirackal Airookaran Joseph, and Subburaj Rengasamy (collectively, "Amended Plaintiffs"). The court has received and considered the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 216), recommending that the court grant the motion. No objections were filed to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed.
It is therefore ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. No. 216) is ADOPTED; and the "Motion of Amended Plaintiffs to Dismiss Without Prejudice the Claims Against Defendant Michael Pol" (Doc. No. 98) is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
