BRUCK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 4:13CV691. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20150326892
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. SCHELL , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On February 27, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the decision of the Administrative Law J
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. SCHELL , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On February 27, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the decision of the Administrative Law Ju..
More
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
RICHARD A. SCHELL, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 27, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge be AFFIRMED.
The court, having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Plaintiff, is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections of Plaintiff are without merit as to the ultimate recommendation. Therefore, the court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court. It is, therefore,
ORDERED that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge is AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
