STARR v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 6:13cv955. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20150923f04
Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER , District Judge . Plaintiff Valorie Kim Starr filed the above-styled and numbered civil action pursuant to the Social Security Act, Section 205(g), for judicial review of the Commissioners's denial of her application for Social Security benefits. The cause of action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the decision of
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER , District Judge . Plaintiff Valorie Kim Starr filed the above-styled and numbered civil action pursuant to the Social Security Act, Section 205(g), for judicial review of the Commissioners's denial of her application for Social Security benefits. The cause of action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the decision of ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Valorie Kim Starr filed the above-styled and numbered civil action pursuant to the Social Security Act, Section 205(g), for judicial review of the Commissioners's denial of her application for Social Security benefits. The cause of action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the decision of the Commissioner should be reversed and the cause should be remanded to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Court.
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Neither party has filed any objections. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is accordingly
ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and that the cause be remanded to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for proceedings consistent with this Court's opinion. It is further
ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
