U.S. v. SCHMIDT, 4:12-CR-60. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20160108d29
Visitors: 22
Filed: Jan. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT, III , District Judge . Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, the Court having heretofore referred the request for the revocation of Defendant's supervised release to the United States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to its order. Defendant having waived allocu
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT, III , District Judge . Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, the Court having heretofore referred the request for the revocation of Defendant's supervised release to the United States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to its order. Defendant having waived allocut..
More
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AMOS L. MAZZANT, III, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, the Court having heretofore referred the request for the revocation of Defendant's supervised release to the United States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to its order. Defendant having waived allocution before the Court as well as his right to object to the report of the Magistrate Judge, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct.
It is therefore, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
It is further ORDERED that Defendant's supervised release is hereby REVOKED.
It is further ORDERED that Defendant be committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons for a term of imprisonment for a term of eighteen (18) months, with no term of supervised release to follow.
The Court recommends that Defendant be housed in the Bureau of Prisons Seagoville facility, if appropriate.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
