TINNUS ENTERPRISES, LLC v. TELEBRANDS CORP., 6:15-cv-00551 RWS-JDL. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20160321a69
Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROBERT W. SCHROEDER, III , District Judge . The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(3). On February 23, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation containing his proposed findings and recommending that Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for Contempt of Court against Defendant Telebrands Corporation be denied.
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROBERT W. SCHROEDER, III , District Judge . The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(3). On February 23, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation containing his proposed findings and recommending that Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for Contempt of Court against Defendant Telebrands Corporation be denied. ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER, III, District Judge.
The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). On February 23, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation containing his proposed findings and recommending that Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for Contempt of Court against Defendant Telebrands Corporation be denied. (Doc. No. 144.) No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed during the prescribed objection period.
The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court.
So ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
