KINGMAN HOLDINGS, LLC v. US BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 4:15cv279. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20160629j83
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RON CLARK , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On June 15, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #28] be gra
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RON CLARK , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On June 15, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #28] be gran..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
RON CLARK, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On June 15, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #28] be granted.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed,1 this Court is of the opinion the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is therefore
ORDERED Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #28] is GRANTED. It is further
ORDERED Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
All relief not previously granted is DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action.
FootNotes
1. On June 20, 2016, the Court emailed counsel for both parties, requesting they submit any objections to the Report and Recommendation by Friday, June 24, 2016. Counsel for both parties acknowledged receipt of the email. As of Monday, June 27, 2016, no objections have been filed.
Source: Leagle
