HUSSEY v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, 4:08cv309. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20160907729
Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2016
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL AMOS L. MAZZANT, III , District Judge . The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed with prejudice. Petitioner filed objections. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consi
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL AMOS L. MAZZANT, III , District Judge . The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed with prejudice. Petitioner filed objections. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consid..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
AMOS L. MAZZANT, III, District Judge.
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed with prejudice. Petitioner filed objections.
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Petitioner to the Report, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is further
ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED.
Source: Leagle
