USELTON v. COLVIN, 4:13-CV-551. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20160927h58
Visitors: 15
Filed: Sep. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT, III , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On September 2, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #33) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the final decision of the Commissioner of So
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT, III , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On September 2, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #33) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the final decision of the Commissioner of Soc..
More
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AMOS L. MAZZANT, III, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 2, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #33) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") be REMANDED.
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the Court hereby adopts the same as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REMANDED for further review.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
