SIMON CHO v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 4:16-CV-256. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20170315f85
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2017
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT, III , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On February 17, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #63) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that each of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt.
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT, III , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On February 17, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #63) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that each of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #..
More
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AMOS L. MAZZANT, III, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 17, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #63) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that each of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #25) and Defendant's Supplemental Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #48) be granted in part and denied in part.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that each of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #25) and Defendant's Supplemental Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #48) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and Plaintiffs' request for forfeiture of principal and interest in connection with a declaratory judgment is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
