Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. McLEMORE, 5:17CR9(5). (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. Texas Number: infdco20171101h08 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2017
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROBERT W. SCHROEDER, III , District Judge . The above-styled matter was referred to the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Judge Bryant conducted a hearing on October 30, 2017 in the form and manner prescribed by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued a Report and Recommendation (do
More

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above-styled matter was referred to the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Judge Bryant conducted a hearing on October 30, 2017 in the form and manner prescribed by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued a Report and Recommendation (document #66). Judge Bryant recommended that the Court accept Defendant's guilty plea and conditionally approve the plea agreement. He further recommended that the Court finally adjudge Defendant as guilty of Count 1 of the Indictment which charges a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute at least 500 grams of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine. The Court is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation should be accepted. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (document #66) is ADOPTED. It is further

ORDERED that the Defendant's guilty plea is accepted and approved by the Court. Further, the plea agreement is approved by the Court, conditioned upon a review of the presentence report. It is finally

ORDERED that, pursuant to the Defendant's plea agreement, the Court finds the Defendant GUILTY of Count 1 of the Indictment in the above-numbered cause and enters a JUDGMENT OF GUILTY against the Defendant as to Count 1 of the Indictment.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer