Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Harmon v. Carpco Efficient Energy Co., LLC, 2:17-CV-00429-JRG-RSP. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Texas Number: infdco20180212949 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Payne, Dkt. No. 37, which recommends that Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. No. 20, and Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. No. 26, be denied. For dispositive matters referred to a Magistrate Judge, the district court must "determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(
More

ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Payne, Dkt. No. 37, which recommends that Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. No. 20, and Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. No. 26, be denied. For dispositive matters referred to a Magistrate Judge, the district court must "determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). "The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommend disposition." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Applying this standard, and upon de novo review, the Court finds no reason to reject or modify the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

(1) Carpco Efficient Energy Co., LLC's objections, Dkt. No. 42, are OVERRULED.

(2) The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 37, is ADOPTED.

(3) Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. No. 20, is DENIED.

(4) Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. No. 26, is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer