EMED Technologies Corporation v. EMED Technologies Corporation, 2:15-CV-01167-JRG-RSP. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20181210f30
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP , District Judge . The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Now before the Court is the Report & Recommendation (Dkt. No. 80) by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 66) be denied and Plaintiff's motion to amend its infringement contentions (Dkt. No. 67) be granted. No party has objected to the Report & Recommendation. Having r
Summary: ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP , District Judge . The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Now before the Court is the Report & Recommendation (Dkt. No. 80) by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 66) be denied and Plaintiff's motion to amend its infringement contentions (Dkt. No. 67) be granted. No party has objected to the Report & Recommendation. Having re..
More
ORDER
RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge.
The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Now before the Court is the Report & Recommendation (Dkt. No. 80) by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 66) be denied and Plaintiff's motion to amend its infringement contentions (Dkt. No. 67) be granted. No party has objected to the Report & Recommendation.
Having reviewed Magistrate Judge Payne's report, Defendant's motion, Plaintiff's response (Dkt. No. 69) and sur-reply (Dkt. No. 73) to Defendant's motion (Dkt. No. 66), Plaintiff's motion, and Defendant's response (Dkt. No. 70) and sur-reply (Dkt. No. 72) to Plaintiff's motion (Dkt. No. 67), the Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Payne's Report & Recommendation is correct. The Report & Recommendation (Dkt. No. 80) is hereby ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 66) is DENIED and Plaintiff's motion to amend its infringement contentions (Dkt. No. 67) is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
