Seldon v. Commissioner of Social Security, 5:18CV1-RWS-CMC. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20181220f01
Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROBERT W. SCHROEDER, III , District Judge . The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action has been presented for consideration. Docket No. 14. No objections to the Report and
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROBERT W. SCHROEDER, III , District Judge . The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action has been presented for consideration. Docket No. 14. No objections to the Report and R..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER, III, District Judge.
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action has been presented for consideration. Docket No. 14. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. Thus, any aggrieved party is not entitled to de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
Nonetheless, the Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. There being no grounds of plain error or manifest injustice, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. See United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 683 (1980) ("[T]he statute permits the district court to give to the magistrate's proposed findings of fact and recommendations `such weight as [their] merit commands and the sound discretion of the judge warrants'") (quoting Mathews v. Weber, 23 U.S. 261, 275 (1976)). Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiff's above-entitled Social Security action is hereby REVERSED AND REMANDED. It is further
ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED and the referral order is VACATED.
Source: Leagle