Smith v. Stephens, 6:18-cv-185. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20181224d44
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER ROBERT W. SCHROEDER, III , District Judge . The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions and recommendation for the disposition of the complaint has been presented for consideration. Docket No. 12. The Report and Recommendation recommends that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice (Docket No. 11) be granted and the complaint be dismissed without prejudice. See Id. Plaintiff received the Report and Recommendation no later
Summary: ORDER ROBERT W. SCHROEDER, III , District Judge . The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions and recommendation for the disposition of the complaint has been presented for consideration. Docket No. 12. The Report and Recommendation recommends that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice (Docket No. 11) be granted and the complaint be dismissed without prejudice. See Id. Plaintiff received the Report and Recommendation no later t..
More
ORDER
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER, III, District Judge.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions and recommendation for the disposition of the complaint has been presented for consideration. Docket No. 12. The Report and Recommendation recommends that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice (Docket No. 11) be granted and the complaint be dismissed without prejudice. See Id. Plaintiff received the Report and Recommendation no later than December 3, 2018. Docket No. 13. No written objections have been filed. Thus, any aggrieved party is not entitled to de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C § 636(b)(1)(C). The Court therefore ADOPTS the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as those of the Court. See United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 683 (1980). In light of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice (Docket No. 11) is GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
