Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Covarrubias v. Mapps, 6:17cv192. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Texas Number: infdco20190225c17 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RON CLARK , District Judge . Plaintiff Jaime Covarrubias, a prisoner currently confined in the Texas prison system, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the above-styled and numbered civil lawsuit. In response, Defendant Mapps filed an amended motion for summary judgment requesting the dismissal of all claims against her. (Dkt. #22). The motion was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recomme
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Jaime Covarrubias, a prisoner currently confined in the Texas prison system, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the above-styled and numbered civil lawsuit. In response, Defendant Mapps filed an amended motion for summary judgment requesting the dismissal of all claims against her. (Dkt. #22).

The motion was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that Defendant Mapps' amended motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #22) should be granted, in part, and denied, in part. (Dkt. #24). The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of the motion, has been presented for consideration, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts same as the findings and conclusions of the court. It is accordingly

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #24) is ADOPTED. It is further

ORDERED that Defendant Mapps' amended motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #22) regarding damages against her in her official capacity is GRANTED. It is finally

ORDERED that Defendant Mapps' amended motion for summary (Dkt. #22) regarding the Fourth Amendment cross-gender strip search claim and qualified immunity is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer