Baker v. Puckett, 4:18-CV-599. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20190729945
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On June 14, 2019, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #83) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff's "Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On June 14, 2019, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #83) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff's "Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to L..
More
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AMOS L. MAZZANT, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On June 14, 2019, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #83) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff's "Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Local Rule CV-56" (Dkt. #21) be denied. On June 27, 2019, Plaintiff notified the Court of his non-objection to the report (Dkt. #91).
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Local Rule CV-56" (Dkt. #21) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
