Barnett v. Director, TDCJ-CID, 4:14cv53. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20191008l27
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL RICHARD A. SCHELL , District Judge . The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 should be denied. Petitioner filed objections. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has b
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL RICHARD A. SCHELL , District Judge . The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 should be denied. Petitioner filed objections. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has be..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
RICHARD A. SCHELL, District Judge.
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 should be denied. Petitioner filed objections.
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and having made a de novo review of the objections raised by the Petitioner, the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections are without merit. Therefore, the court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED.
Source: Leagle
