U.S. v. SPARKS, 4:13-CR-081-Y. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20130903d81
Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 29, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2013
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY TERRY R. MEANS, District Judge. After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the respective Consents to Administration of Guilty Plea and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and the Report and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed by any defendant within
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY TERRY R. MEANS, District Judge. After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the respective Consents to Administration of Guilty Plea and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and the Report and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed by any defendant within ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY
TERRY R. MEANS, District Judge.
After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the respective Consents to Administration of Guilty Plea and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and the Report and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed by any defendant within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned district judge concludes that each report and recommendation of the magistrate judge on each plea of guilty is correct, and each is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts each plea of guilty, and each defendant is hereby adjudged guilty. Each defendant's sentence will be imposed in accordance with the sentencing scheduling order previously issued as to each defendant.
Source: Leagle
