URANGA v. STEPHENS, 7:11-CV-088-O-KA. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20140319c87
Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2014
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE REED C. O'CONNOR, District Judge. After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and of Petitioner's objections thereto, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for dismissal set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are h
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE REED C. O'CONNOR, District Judge. After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and of Petitioner's objections thereto, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for dismissal set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are he..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
REED C. O'CONNOR, District Judge.
After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and of Petitioner's objections thereto, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for dismissal set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court.
Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
