JANVEY v. CASTANEDA, 3:11-CV-0299-N. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20141016d18
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. GODBEY, District Judge. This Order addresses the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [doc. 48]. After conducting a review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), together with de novo review of those portions to which objection was made, I am of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are hereby adopted as the determinations of the Court. The Cour
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. GODBEY, District Judge. This Order addresses the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [doc. 48]. After conducting a review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), together with de novo review of those portions to which objection was made, I am of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are hereby adopted as the determinations of the Court. The Court..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. GODBEY, District Judge.
This Order addresses the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [doc. 48]. After conducting a review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), together with de novo review of those portions to which objection was made, I am of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are hereby adopted as the determinations of the Court. The Court therefore denies Defendant Jorge Castaneda's motion to dismiss [22].
Source: Leagle