Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SARMIENTO-PEREZ v. LAS COLINAS INTERNATIONAL INC., 3:14-CV-1898-L. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. Texas Number: infdco20170221j59 Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2017
Summary: ORDER SAM A. LINDSAY , District Judge . Before the court is a Notice of Filing Opt-In Consent Form for Gabriel Rodriguez (Doc. 45), filed July 18, 2015; Notice of Filing Opt-In Consent Form for Travis Trujillo (Doc. 46), filed August 13, 2015; and Defendants' Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 60), filed October 10, 2016. On December 28, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney entered the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), reco
More

ORDER

Before the court is a Notice of Filing Opt-In Consent Form for Gabriel Rodriguez (Doc. 45), filed July 18, 2015; Notice of Filing Opt-In Consent Form for Travis Trujillo (Doc. 46), filed August 13, 2015; and Defendants' Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 60), filed October 10, 2016. On December 28, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney entered the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), recommending that the court strike Plaintiffs Gabriel Rodriguez and Travis Trujillo's opt-in consent forms and dismiss their claims for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and that the Defendants' Motion for Sanctions be denied as moot. There are no objections to the Report.

Having reviewed the motion, record in this case, applicable law, and Report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court strikes Plaintiff Gabriel Rodriguez's Notice of Filing Opt-In Consent Form (Doc. 45) and Plaintiff Travis Trujillo's Notice of Filing Opt-In Consent Form for (Doc. 46); and dismisses without prejudice their claims for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The court also denies as moot Defendant's Motion for a sanctions (Doc. 60).

It is so ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer